🔗 Share this article

It has been described as among the biggest deceptions of its kind in the UK.

A total of 14 people have been sentenced for their involvement in a £28m scheme to cheat in excess of 3,500 vacation property investors.

The affected individuals were keen to exit decades-old timeshare contracts and tried to find help.

The majority were from 60 and 80. In excess of 500 of them parted with more than £10,000, and a single victim paid more than £80,000.

Those victimized were subjected to intense presentations extending for six hours. They were out of money, holding useless fake "points" and still bound by high-priced holiday ownership agreements they could no longer use.

The Business At the Heart of the Fraud

The company at the heart of the fraud was the organization in question. They accepted people's money to fund the owners' lavish standard of living of prestigious schooling, luxury homes and personal aircraft.

The individual at the top of the company, Mark Rowe, was handed a 90-month jail time in January for conspiracy to defraud.

In the latest development, his partner one of the co-defendants was one of the final three to receive sentencing.

She was handed a two-year suspended prison term at the judicial venue after confessing to money laundering.

The outcome represents a lengthy process and represents a huge win for the individuals who testified, the law enforcement and the Crown.

How the Investigation Began

I first heard about SMT came in the mid-2016. I was working in the investigations unit of a broadcasting service, creating documentary features.

A colleague noted that his parent had inherited the rights of a timeshare apartment in Spain and, after decades of vacations, had begun looking to get out of the contract.

It's worth mentioning how common timeshares had become with British holidaymakers in the eighties and nineties.

Timeshares enabled people to use the same accommodation each season, or swap their time slots with fellow investors who had properties in different locations. Approximately 600,000 holiday enthusiasts accepted that option.

The initial boom was accompanied by a numerous stories about dishonest operators fraudulently marketing properties. They appeared frequently on public interest TV programmes.

The common holiday ownership agreement bound owners for many years.

In that period, those owners who had used their regular accommodation in the resort for 20 or 30 years were advancing in years, and a significant number were attempting to wave goodbye to their vacation investments.

A number had declining mobility and were unable to visit their properties. Some just felt they'd achieved their goals from them. And others had died, in numerous instances leaving their family members to take over the contracts - along with their annual payments and maintenance fees.

The Undercover Operation Progresses

It was at this point the family member had been placed. She looked online for options and discovered SMT, a enterprise whose website claimed to terminate her agreement.

Yet, having submitted funds and booked a meeting with them, her loved ones smelled a rat.

Subsequent checking uncovered hundreds of people saying they had paid money and got nothing in return. Indeed, they had suffered financially. Substantial amounts.

Our team commenced probing what was occurring. It quickly became clear that there were some shady characters operating in the vacation property industry.

A legal professional had many grievance cases aiming to litigate against the organization.

The team interviewed people who had used the firm and they each reported similar experiences. They believed the firm would purchase their timeshare off them but when they attended a meeting (for which they submitted funds initially) they were informed there was no market for their property.

In place of that, they were persuaded - indeed coerced - to commit further cash investing in "the company's points system", named after the outfit's parent company, the overarching entity.

The nature of these rewards was rather ambiguous. They seemed similar to a kind of currency, providing cheaper vacations and services and retail offers.

And they were seemingly "transferable with additional holders, some time down the line.

Investing money immediately would produce an long-term benefit that would cover SMT's fees and leave the investor with a gain, freed at last from their pesky contract.

An unbelievable offer? Well, yes.

A 'Misleading Tactic'

Based on these descriptions were correct, this was a large-scale fraud.

The technique is termed a "misleading sales."

Someone - here SMT - "attracts the client by promoting a defined offering but then to say that's not available, directing the individual to an alternative, lesser offering.

This is against the law. Equipped with all the testimony we had assembled, we made the case to secretly film one of the firm's consultations.

The process requires dedication, work, and strong justifications for why this is the sole method to collect the information needed to demonstrate illegal activity.

Armed with that permission, our small team arranged a appointment with one of the company's representatives in the location.

Posing as a potential client wanting to get his mum out of her timeshare contract|holiday ownership agreement