🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.